Enter a height and a weight and get a Body Mass Index figure, the band it falls into, and the weight range that would put you inside the normal band. All three come from the standard formula, calculated in the page rather than on a server.
This page is an educational calculator, not a medical device, and it does not diagnose, treat or prevent any condition. Its output is a general estimate built from average population figures; it ignores individual factors such as age, body composition, pregnancy, medication and medical history. Always speak to a qualified clinician about your own situation before acting on any number shown here.
Body Mass Index is a single ratio — weight divided by the square of height — invented as a way to compare populations, not individuals. It has survived because it needs two numbers that anyone can supply without equipment, and because the bands it produces correlate well enough with health outcomes across large groups. What it does not do is distinguish between the components of that weight. Muscle, fat, bone and fluid all count the same, which is the source of nearly every criticism of it and the reason it should be read alongside other measurements rather than instead of them.
The bands are fixed thresholds and the page applies them in order, testing the lowest first. Every boundary belongs to the upper band, so a BMI of exactly 25.0 is Overweight rather than the top of Normal weight.
These are the cases where a BMI figure should be set aside rather than interpreted, and they are not edge cases — they cover a large share of the population.
| Alternative | Notes |
|---|---|
| Waist circumference | Measures where fat is stored, which matters more for metabolic risk than the total. The conventional thresholds are 94 cm for men and 80 cm for women, with lower figures recommended for South Asian populations. A normal BMI with a large waist is a real combination. |
| Waist-to-height ratio | Waist divided by height, with 0.5 widely used as a simple threshold. Uses the same kind of arithmetic as BMI but tracks central fat, which is the component most associated with cardiovascular risk. |
| Waist-to-hip ratio | Adds distribution to the picture. A WHtR or WHR in the risky range alongside an unremarkable BMI is the pattern most worth discussing with a clinician. |
| Body fat percentage | The measurement BMI is often mistaken for. Requires equipment — callipers, a scale using bioelectrical impedance, or a DEXA scan — none of which are available from a browser. |
| Trend over time | The most useful measurement available with no equipment at all. One reading is a snapshot; a change over six months, measured the same way, tells you what a single figure cannot. |
It is a screening measure and it is best read as one. For a whole population the relationship between BMI, body fat and health outcomes is strong enough to be useful. For one person at one moment it can be misleading in both directions: a muscular athlete can land in the overweight band with low body fat, and someone with little muscle can land in the normal band with a high fat proportion. Waist measurements close part of that gap.
They are collected because people expect to supply them and because they belong on a health form. The adult BMI formula is deliberately independent of both — that independence is exactly why the index works as a screening tool, since it needs nothing beyond a height and a weight. Different bands apply to children, and those bands require a percentile chart rather than a formula.
The conventional normal band is 18.5 to 24.9. It is worth treating it as a band rather than a target, and worth noting that it is not the same as an ideal. A figure at the lower end is not automatically better than one in the middle — the health outcomes associated with the band are broadly similar across it, and the risks of being underweight are real.
No. Children and adolescents need age-and-sex-specific percentile curves, because both the healthy range and the meaning of a given figure change as a child grows. A number that would be unremarkable in an adult can be a concern in a nine-year-old, and the reverse. Ask a paediatrician for the appropriate chart.
No. The calculation is a few lines of JavaScript running in the page, and the form has no network call attached to it. Nothing is stored, and closing the tab leaves no record on the device.
Last verified: October 7, 2026
All Tools · All Tools · About · How We Test · Contact · Privacy
Maintained by Huang Bin · Last updated October 3, 2026