Generate the markup for a login form and paste it into your project. Choose whether people sign in with an email address or a username, decide which optional features you want, and copy out clean HTML with the styling already applied.
It is worth being explicit about what this generates, because the distinction matters. The page produces the front end of a login form — the visible fields, their labels and their markup. It does not create a user database, does not check credentials and cannot, because it runs entirely in your browser with no server behind it. What you get is the part that is tedious to write correctly, to be dropped into an application that already has a backend.
The difference between the three methods is more than the label on the field. It changes the input type, the field name and the autocomplete hint, and those last two affect how password managers handle the form.
Generating the markup is the easy part. These are the things that decide whether the form is safe once it is in place, and none of them can be handled by a front-end generator.
| Alternative | Notes |
|---|---|
| Email address | The default for consumer products because people remember it and it doubles as a contact channel. The cost is that email addresses change, and an account keyed to one needs a migration path when they do. |
| Username | Stable and memorable, and it avoids publishing an email address on public profiles. The cost is another thing to remember, and people will reuse or forget it. Common in games and internal tools for that reason. |
| Email or username | The most forgiving option and the one that produces the fewest support requests. It costs you a slightly more complex lookup on the server, since the identifier has to be matched against two columns. |
| Passwordless by email link | Removes the password entirely and the large majority of account security incidents along with it. Worth considering before adding another password form to the world, though it shifts the dependency to the security of the email account itself. |
No. It generates the HTML for the form only. There is no database, no session handling and no credential checking, because the page runs entirely in your browser with nothing behind it. You need a backend that receives the submission and verifies it. The value here is that you get correctly structured, accessible markup without writing it out by hand.
Wherever you set in the submission address field. That value goes into the action attribute of the form, so the browser posts to it directly. If you leave the default of /login, the browser posts to a path called login on your own domain. Nothing is sent anywhere while you are using this page, since there is no submit action attached to the preview.
More than they appear. They are what allow a password manager to recognise the form, fill an existing credential and offer to save a new one. A login form without them often leaves users typing passwords by hand from a notes app, which is precisely the behaviour that leads to weak, reused passwords. The generated markup sets them, which is a small detail with a real effect.
It uses labels associated with each input, which is the essential requirement, and the inputs carry proper types so that screen readers and mobile keyboards behave correctly. It does not include an aria-live region for error messages, because error presentation depends on your application's own validation approach. If you add inline errors, wire them to the field with an aria-describedby attribute.
Last verified: October 3, 2026
All Tools · All Tools · About · How We Test · Contact · Privacy
Maintained by Huang Bin · Last updated October 3, 2026